The story of Sicario follows FBI agent Kate Macer (Emily Blunt). Kate is signed to a special task force run by government official Matt Gracer (Josh Brolin). The team's mission is take down a powerful cartel in Mexico by any means necessary. This includes enlisting the help of a mysterious hitman named Alejandro Gillick (Benicio Del Toro). As the mission goes on, Kate questions the motivation of this task force and the role she has to play in stopping this cartel.

The cast of Sicario may have been small, but it was certainly a strong grouping of actors. Emily Blunt had a solid performance as Kate: whom was an effectual guide to the world of Sicario. Josh Brolin provided his unique charisma as Matt. Though Matt had several comedic lines in the film, he could also be intimidating. This contrast in Matt's personality simply showcased the variety in Brolin's performance. Then there was Benicio Del Toro as Alejandro. Like his peers, Del Toro showed his range as Alejandro was an anti-hero that I could not help but find interesting. Along with the strong leads was an impressive supporting cast; featuring the likes of Daniel Kaluuya, Victor Garber, Jeffery Donvan and Jon Bernthal. The only issue I had with the cast were the characters' execution. The performances were good, there was no denying it, but the characters themselves were lacking in development. This is not to say that I did not find the characters engaging, but I could not help but feel that more could have been done to make this cast a stronger ensemble.
Sicario's technical factors were fitting given the film's concepts. The film's cinematography captured the world of Mexico and elaborated the film's gritty tone. The film's action may not have had the most impact, but it did feel appropriate given the concepts behind Sicario. The score by Johann Johannsson was good for the movie; though I was surprised at how subtle the music was. These elements were effective, but like the film's other factors, there was one thing that prevented these aspects from being solid. In this case it was the direction. Denis Villenueve's direction was by no means bad, but there was something that was working against the technical elements. Perhaps it was a need to make these factors stand out. For example: while the cinematography was good, there were moments and shots that either went to long or were handled in a strange manner. It was great to see Villenueve and the other filmmakers put so much emphasis into Sicario's technical aspects, but this seems to be a case where less would have been more.
While the may not have been the definitive crime thriller, Sicario was still a unique presentation. The movie showed the dark underworld of Mexico and how dealing with cartels can be a gray situation. Along with strong story elements were fantastic performances from the whole cast; as well as techincal factors that were fitting for a film such as Sicario. When it comes down to it, the film's major issue was its execution. The movie was quite effective but if just elaborated in certain areas, then it could have been a stronger feature. Yet while it may have its share of issues, Sicario was still (in this adventurer's opinion) an engaging thriller.
No comments:
Post a Comment